Approfondimenti scientifici
Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) in early childhood: medical-scientific framework
The Abusive Head Trauma (AHT), previously referred to in literature as Shaken Baby Syndrome, represents one of the most serious forms of physical maltreatment in early childhood and is associated with a high neurological morbidity and a significant mortality.

The term AHT identifies a set of cranial and intracranial injuries caused by the intentional application of traumatic forces to the child’s head, with or without evidence of direct impact. The particular neurological vulnerability of infants is related to the anatomical and physiological characteristics typical of the first months of life, including the greater ratio between head and body size, the immaturity of the cervical musculature and the greater susceptibility of the central nervous system to sudden accelerations and decelerations.
The clinical manifestations can be variable and include alterations in the state of consciousness, irritability, vomiting, seizures, difficulty in feeding, apnea and other focal neurological signs.
The diagnosis always requires a multidisciplinary approach that integrates clinical evaluation, neuroimaging, ophthalmological examination, skeletal survey and analysis of the family and social context.
The main international scientific societies, including the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP), Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH) and the World Health Organization (WHO), emphasize the importance of early recognition, child protection and collaboration between healthcare professionals, social services and competent authorities.
Alongside diagnosis and management, primary prevention represents one of the most effective tools for reducing the risk of AHT. Informing caregivers about normal child development, infant crying and stress management strategies is now an essential component of child protection policies.
Definition and evolution of terminology
Abusive head trauma is a complex clinical condition in which neurological damage results from the intentional application of traumatic forces to the child’s head.
In the past, the literature primarily used the term Shaken Baby Syndrome (SBS) to describe the clinical picture associated with the violent shaking of the infant, characterized by the presence of subdural hemorrhage, retinal hemorrhages and brain damage.
The evolution of scientific knowledge has however shown that these injuries can derive from different traumatic mechanisms, including not only shaking, but also direct impacts and sudden movements of acceleration and deceleration. For this reason, the international scientific community has progressively adopted the term Abusive Head Trauma (AHT), considered more representative of the entire spectrum of injuries attributable to physical abuse. The American Academy of Pediatrics formalized this terminological change specifically to promote a more complete and accurate description of the phenomenon (Christian & Block, 2009).
The Abusive Head Trauma is therefore defined as trauma to the head and intracranial structures caused by external forces resulting from intentional behavior or an action characterized by a high risk of causing injury to the child.
From a clinical point of view, the following may be present:
- intracranial hemorrhage, in particular subdural hematoma
- traumatic brain injuries;
- cerebral edema;
- retinal hemorrhages;
- skull fractures and other associated skeletal injuries.
The particular vulnerability of children in the first years of life is linked to some anatomical and physiological characteristics:
- greater ratio of head weight to body mass;
- still immature cervical control;
- reduced stabilization capacity during accelerative movements;
- high sensitivity of the brain tissue in the development phase.
As Gabaeff (2011) emphasizes, the understanding of AHT always requires an integrated analysis of the traumatic mechanism, the clinical picture and the diagnostic evidence, avoiding interpretations based on a single finding.
Epidemiology and clinical consequences
The real incidence of Abusive Head Trauma is difficult to define with precision, both due to the variability of surveillance systems and the possible underestimation of cases.
According to Piteau et al. (2012), abusive head trauma represents one of the leading causes of death and permanent neurological disability in children victims of physical abuse.
Children under 12 months of age are particularly vulnerable, both because of the anatomical characteristics typical of this stage of development and because of their complete dependence on the adults who care for them. The period of greatest risk is frequently identified in the first six months of life, when infant crying can physiologically reach its peak and can represent a source of stress for some caregivers.
The possible consequences may include:
- cognitive deficits;
- motor disorders;
- epilepsy;
- alterations in visual function;
- behavioral difficulties;
- neurodevelopmental disorders.
Pathophysiology
The Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) results in a complex set of biomechanical, vascular and cellular alterations that can affect the brain tissue, meninges, intracranial blood vessels and ocular structures.
The extent of damage depends on several factors, including the intensity and duration of the applied forces, the age of the child and their specific anatomical vulnerability. In infants, in fact, the head represents a relatively larger portion of the body and the cervical muscles have not yet reached adequate development. Consequently, sudden acceleration and deceleration movements can cause a displacement of the brain within the skull, resulting in mechanical stress on nervous and vascular structures.
Neurological damage can develop through two main mechanisms:
- primary injury, directly caused by the traumatic forces applied to the brain tissue;
- secondary injury, resulting from the processes following the trauma, such as hypoxia, cerebral edema, metabolic changes and increased intracranial pressure.
These events can be combined, contributing to the progression of neurological damage.
Biomechanical mechanisms and intracranial damage
Acceleration and deceleration forces cause relative displacement between the brain, meninges and vascular structures. This phenomenon can cause stretching and, in more severe cases, rupture of the bridging veins, with subsequent formation of subdural hematoma, one of the most frequently observed findings in cases of AHT.
It is important to emphasize that the presence of a subdural hemorrhage, like any other diagnostic finding, is not in itself sufficient to confirm the diagnosis of abusive head trauma. As highlighted by the review by Narang et al. (2016), the diagnosis always requires integration of clinical, anamestic and radiological data and multidisciplinary evaluation.
In more severe cases, respiratory alterations, episodes of apnea and a progressive impairment of neurological status may appear. The reduction of oxygen supply to the brain can cause hypoxic-ischemic damage, aggravating the effects of the primary injury.
The resulting cerebral edema can increase intracranial pressure and further reduce cerebral perfusion, feeding a vicious circle that contributes to the progression of damage.
Parallel to this, numerous biological processes are activated, including:
- inflammatory response;
- alteration of the blood-brain barrier;
- oxidative stress;
- neuronal cell death.
These mechanisms represent the biological basis for possible medium- and long-term neurological consequences.
Clinical manifestations
The clinical picture of Abusive Head Trauma can be extremely variable. Some children present evident neurological signs from the early stages, while others may initially manifest more subtle and nonspecific symptoms.
Among the main clinical signs observed are:
- alteration of the state of consciousness;
- marked sleepiness or reduced responsiveness;
- inconsolable irritability;
- vomiting;
- difficulty feeding;
- reduced interaction with the environment;
- epileptic seizures;
- episodes of apnea;
- alterations in muscle tone;
- gaze abnormalities.
In infants, early recognition can be complex because initial symptoms can be confused with conditions common in the pediatric age. For this reason, a sudden change in behavior, especially if associated with neurological signs or a clinical history inconsistent with the observed clinical picture, always requires a timely specialist evaluation.
Clinical diagnosis and multidisciplinary approach
The diagnosis of AHT requires a structured and multidisciplinary path, in which clinical, radiological, ophthalmological, and forensic expertise contribute to a comprehensive evaluation of the child. The goal is not only to identify any injury, but also to understand the clinical context and promptly ensure the protection of the minor, through collaboration between healthcare professionals, social services, and competent authorities.
The guidelines of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) recommend a systematic evaluation in children with suspected abusive head trauma, including a thorough history, a complete physical examination, and the use of the most appropriate diagnostic investigations (Christian & Block, 2009).
The diagnostic process generally involves several professional figures, including:
- pediatrician;
- emergency physician;
- neurosurgeon;
- neuroradiologist;
- pediatric ophthalmologist;
- forensic medical examiner;
- psychologist;
- social worker.
The integration of different skills allows for the correct interpretation of the clinical picture, preventing individual findings from being considered in isolation.
Neuroimaging
The neuroimaging represents one of the fundamental tools of the diagnostic process.
In the acute phase, computed tomography (CT) of the brain is often the first examination performed, as it allows rapid identification of:
- intracranial hemorrhages;
- skull fractures;
- cerebral edema;
- other acute alterations.
Subsequently, the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows for a more detailed evaluation of the brain parenchyma, helping to define the extent of the lesions and their evolution over time.
According to the recommendations of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH, 2020), images must be interpreted by specialists with experience in pediatric neuroradiology and always integrated with the clinical history, physical examination, and other diagnostic tests.
Ophthalmological evaluation
The ophthalmological evaluation represents an important component of the diagnostic process when the clinical picture suggests possible abusive head trauma. In particular, the search for retinal hemorrhages through fundus examination must be performed by an ophthalmologist with experience in the pediatric field.
As the RCPCH guidelines emphasize, this finding must also be interpreted within the context of the entire clinical picture: no single sign is sufficient, by itself, to confirm or exclude the diagnosis of AHT.
Skeletal evaluation
In young children with suspected maltreatment, a complete skeletal survey may be indicated, aimed at identifying any bone lesions not evident on clinical examination.
The presence of rib fractures or bone lesions at different stages of healing can provide relevant information within the overall assessment.
The American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Radiology recommend the use of specific radiological protocols to ensure accurate and standardized investigation in cases of suspected physical abuse.
Recommendations from major scientific societies
The recommendations currently adopted internationally are mainly derived from documents published by:
- American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP);
- Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH);
- World Health Organization (WHO).
Despite different organizational approaches, these institutions share some fundamental principles:
- early recognition of clinical signs compatible with AHT;
- ensure a multidisciplinary evaluation;
- ensure the immediate protection of the child when necessary;
- accurately document the diagnostic process;
- promote primary prevention through educational programs aimed at caregivers.
The increasing focus of scientific societies on prevention reflects a principle that is now widely shared: informing and supporting families is an essential component of protecting child health and development.
Primary prevention
Primary prevention of Abusive Head Trauma (AHT) is one of the most effective tools for protecting the health and development of children in the first months of life. Preventive interventions are based on information, education and support for caregivers, with the goal of fostering greater knowledge of child development, improving the management of stress situations, and promoting safe caregiving practices.
A central element of prevention concerns the understanding of infant crying, a physiological manifestation of development that generally peaks between the second week and the third to fourth month of life, and then progressively decreases (Barr et al., 2012). Knowing this normal evolution helps parents interpret crying as a developmental phase and not as a sign of parental inadequacy or failure to respond to the child’s needs. Early information thus represents a concrete tool for reducing stress and fostering a calmer caregiving relationship.
1. Education on infant crying and soothing strategies
Education programs for caregivers aim to provide practical knowledge on the meaning of crying and the most appropriate ways to respond to the child’s needs.
Among the main strategies recommended are:
- check the child’s basic needs (feeding, diaper change, body temperature, and comfort);
- offer reassuring physical contact, through holding, proximity and, when appropriate, skin-to-skin contact;
- reduce environmental stimuli if the child appears overstimulated;
- use a calm voice, gentle movements, and predictable routines;
- recognize that some crying episodes may persist despite soothing strategies.
The goal is not to stop the crying immediately, but to help the caregiver maintain a calm, safe, and respectful response to the child’s needs.
2. Promoting stress regulation on the part of the caregiver
Taking care of a newborn can be emotionally challenging. For this reason, prevention programs pay particular attention to parental stress management.
When crying becomes intense or prolonged, it is important for the caregiver to be able to recognize their limits and use self-regulation strategies. If necessary, it is advisable to temporarily place the child in a safe place, such as the crib, and take a few minutes to regain emotional control before resuming care.
This simple instruction, promoted by numerous international prevention campaigns, helps replace an impulsive response with a conscious and safe choice. Promoting the psychological well-being of parents, offering support in the postnatal period, and identifying situations of particular vulnerability early are fundamental elements in AHT prevention.
3. Education on the risks of shaking and promotion of physical safety
An essential aspect of prevention consists in informing caregivers about the consequences of violent shaking of an infant. In the first months of life, the nervous system is particularly vulnerable and abrupt head movements can cause serious brain injuries.
For this reason, it is important to remember that:
- a child must never be shaken, even in an attempt to stop the crying;
- even short-lived episodes can cause significant neurological consequences;
- the risk increases when the caregiver is overwhelmed by fatigue, frustration, or stress.
Prevention must involve not only the parents, but all the people who take care of the child, including family members, babysitters, and other caregivers.
4. Promotion of the safe use of transport and daily management devices
Protecting the child also involves the adoption of correct safety practices in everyday life.
Caregivers should receive information on the appropriate use of:
- carriages;
- strollers;
- carrying systems;
- car seats;
- containment devices.
The use of these tools must always respect the manufacturer’s instructions regarding the age, weight, and correct positioning of the child.
Although some devices may integrate technological support systems, no technology can replace the attention, supervision, and presence of an adult.
5. Promotion of seeking help
One of the most important messages of prevention concerns the normalization of seeking help.
During the first months of a child’s life, it is normal to experience fatigue, frustration, or moments of difficulty. Recognizing these emotions and sharing them represents responsible and protective behavior.
Prevention programs promote:
- the involvement of the family and social network;
- consultation with pediatricians, midwives, and other healthcare professionals;
- access to local services and parenting support programs.
Asking for support means taking care of oneself and, at the same time, of one’s child.
Conclusions
The available scientific evidence indicates that educational programs aimed at caregivers improve knowledge on infant crying, stress regulation strategies, and the risks associated with infant shaking (Barr et al., 2012; Scott et al., 2022).
Although further studies are needed to more precisely define their impact on the incidence of Abusive Head Trauma, there is a broad consensus on the value of early information, parenting support, and prevention as fundamental tools for promoting children’s health and safety.
Abusive Head Trauma represents a serious condition but, in many cases, potentially preventable. Spreading scientifically founded knowledge, supporting caregivers in moments of greatest difficulty, and fostering a collaborative network between families, healthcare professionals, and local services means contributing concretely to the protection of child development and the well-being of children from the first months of life.
Narang SK, Fingarson A, Lukefahr J; Council on Child Abuse and Neglect. Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children. Pediatrics. 2020
Christian CW, Block R; Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect, American Academy of Pediatrics. Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children. Pediatrics. 2009
Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health (RCPCH). Child Protection Companion: Abusive Head Trauma. London: RCPCH; 2020
World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the Health Sector Response to Child Maltreatment. Geneva: WHO; 2019
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Child maltreatment: when to suspect maltreatment in under 18s. NICE Guideline NG76. Updated 2023
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Preventing Abusive Head Trauma Among Children. Atlanta: CDC; 2022
Guthkelch AN. Infantile subdural haematoma and its relationship to whiplash injuries. British Medical Journal. 1971
Caffey J. The whiplash shaken infant syndrome: manual shaking by the extremities with whiplash-induced intracranial and intraocular bleedings, linked with residual permanent brain damage and mental retardation. Pediatrics. 1972
Kemp AM, Jaspan T, Griffiths J, et al. Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2011
Piteau SJ, Ward MGK, Barrowman NJ, Plint AC. Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2012
Maguire SA, Pickerd N, Farewell D, Mann M, Tempest V, Kemp AM. Which clinical features distinguish inflicted from non-inflicted brain injury? A systematic review. Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2009
Maguire SA, Watts PO, Shaw AD, et al. Retinal haemorrhages and related findings in abusive and non-abusive head trauma: a systematic review. Eye (London). 2013
Christian CW; Committee on Child Abuse and Neglect. The evaluation of suspected child physical abuse. Pediatrics. 2015
American Academy of Pediatrics Section on Radiology. Diagnostic imaging of child abuse. Pediatrics. 2009
Jenny C, Hymel KP, Ritzen A, Reinert SE, Hay TC. Analysis of missed cases of abusive head trauma. JAMA. 1999Shanahan ME, Zolotor AJ, Parrish JW, Barr RG, Runyan DK. National, regional, and state abusive head trauma: application of the CDC algorithm. Pediatrics. 2013
Barr RG, Trent RB, Cross J. Age-related incidence curve of hospitalized Shaken Baby Syndrome cases: convergent evidence for crying as a trigger to shaking. Child Abuse & Neglect. 2006
Barr RG, Rivara FP, Barr M, et al. Effectiveness of educational materials designed to change knowledge and behaviors regarding crying and shaken-baby syndrome in mothers of newborns. Pediatrics. 2009
Barr RG. Preventing abusive head trauma resulting from a failure of normal interaction between infants and their caregivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA. 2012
Dias MS, Smith K, DeGuehery K, Mazur P, Li V, Shaffer ML. Preventing abusive head trauma among infants and young children: a hospital-based, parent education program. Pediatrics. 2005
American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children: Technical Report.
Pediatrics. 2024
American Academy of Pediatrics. Council on Child Abuse and Neglect.
Abusive Head Trauma in Infants and Children.
Pediatrics. 2020
Sarmiento K, et al.
Long-term outcomes among children with abusive head trauma: a systematic review.
Child Abuse & Neglect. 2023.
necessità di follow-up riabilitativo.
Ben Abdeljelil AB, et al.
Pediatric Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: A Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations.
Neurotrauma Reports. 2023
